Sarah Laskow, "The Nation". A year ago, it seemed possible-likely, even-that President Barack Obama would sweep
into the international negotiations on climate change at Copenhagen and make serious
progress on the tangle of issues at stake. The reality was quite different . This
year, the expectations for the United Nations Climate Conference in Cancun are less
The conference will be held from Nov 29 to Dec 10 and the same issues from 2009
are up for debate. Countries like the United States, Britain, and Germany are still
contributing an outsize share of carbon to the atmosphere. Countries like India
and China are still rapidly increasing their own carbon output. And countries like
Bangladesh, Tuvalu, and Bolivia are still bearing an unfair share of the environmental
impacts brought on by climate change.
A very different set of expectations are building in the climate movement this year.
If last year was about moving forward as fast as possible, this year, climate activists
seem resigned to the idea that politicians just aren't getting it. Change, when
it comes, will have to be be built on a popular movement, not a political negotiation.
Climate change from the bottom up
Last year, climate activists put their faith in international leaders to make progress.
This year, they believe that it's up to them, as outside actors, to marshal a grassroots
movement and pressure their leaders towards decreased carbon emissions.
"There's a recognition that the insider strategy to push from inside the Beltway
to impact what will happen in DC, or what will happen in Cancun has really not
succeeded," Rose Braz, climate campaign director at the Center for Biological Diversity,
told Making Contact's Andrew Stelzer . "What we're doing in conjunction with a number
of groups across the country and across the world is really build the type of movement
that will change what happens in Cancun, what changes what happens in DC from the
bottom up." (This entire episode of Making Contact is dedicated to new approaches
to climate change, at Cancun and beyond, and is worth a listen.)
Fighting the indolence of capitalists
Here's one example of this new strategy: as Zachary Shahan writes at Change.org
, La Via Campesina, an international peasant movement, is coordinating a march that
will begin in San Luis Potosi, Guadalajara, Acapulco, Oaxaca, and Chiapas, then
converge on Cancun. The march will include "thousands of farmers, indigenous people,
rural villagers, urbanites, and more," Shahan reports.
After they arrive in Cancun, the organizers are planning an "Alternative Global
Forum for Life and Environmental and Social Justice" for the final days of the negotiations,
which they say will be a mass mobilisation of peasants, indigenous and social movements.
The action extends far beyond Cancun, though. Actually, they are organizing thousands
of Cancuns around the world on this day to denounce what they see as false climate
These actions echo the strategy that environmentalist and author Bill McKibben and
other climate leaders are promoting to push for climate change policies in the US.
All this talk about building momentum from the bottom up, from populations, means
that anyone looking for change is now looking years into the future.
The US is not leading the way
Of course, ultimately, politicians will need to agree on a couple of standards.
In particular, how much carbon each country should be emitting and how fast each
country should power down its current emission levels. The US is one of the biggest
stumbling blocks to agreement on these questions, especially due to the recent mid-term
elections. As Claudia Salerno, Venezuela's lead climate change negotiator wrote
Unlike what many suggest, China is not the problem. China, along with India and
others, have made considerable commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and
are already working to realize them. Other developing countries have done the same,
although we only generate a virtual drop in the bucket of global carbon emissions.
The key player missing here is the U.S.
China, the US and Clean Coal
The most interesting collaborations on clean energy, however, aren't happening around
the negotiating table. This week, The Atlantic's James Fallows wrote a long piece
about the work that the US and China are doing together on clean coal technology,
the magic cure-all to the world's energy ills.
In the piece, Fallows recognizes what environmentalists have long argued: coal is
bad for the environment and for coal-mining communities. But, unlike clean energy
advocates who want to phase coal out of the energy equation, Fallows argues that
coal must play a part in the world's energy future. Therefore, we must find a way
to burn it without releasing clouds of carbon into the atmosphere. That's where
clean coal technology comes in. So far, however, researchers have had little luck
minimizing coal's carbon output.
A few progressive writers weighed in on Fallows' piece: Grist's David Roberts thought.
Fallows was too hard on the anti-coal camp, while Campus Progress' Sara Rubin argued
that the piece did a good job of grappling with the reality of clean energy economics.
And Mother Jones' Kevin Drum had one very clear criticism-that the piece skated
over the question of progress on carbon capture, the one real way to dramatically
reduce carbon pollution from coal. He wrote :
All the collaboration sounds wonderful, and even a 20% or 30% improvement in coal
technology would be welcome. But that said, sequestration is the holy grail and
I still don't know if the Chinese are doing anything more on that front than the
rest of us.
On every front, then, the view on climate change is now a long one.
* In "The Nation".This article was first published by the "Media Consortium" November